[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-04-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12f55e030ed068d5c7b14c65a74d102db925dab2 commit r10-7622-g12f55e030ed068d5c7b14c65a74d102db925dab2 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-03-17 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6) > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5) > > The ICE seems to be revealing a latent issue: In the following example > > (which GCC accepts), according to the

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-03-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5) > The ICE seems to be revealing a latent issue: In the following example > (which GCC accepts), according to the static_assert labelled (1), the type > of t is

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-03-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka --- The ICE seems to be revealing a latent issue: In the following example (which GCC accepts), according to the static_assert labelled (1), the type of t is const int*, but according to the static_assert

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-03-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-03-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-02-12 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- template void foo(const T t = "; ") { } int main() { foo (); } $ ./cc1plus -quiet 92010.C 92010.C: In function ‘int main()’: 92010.C:8:8: internal compiler error: in tsubst_default_argument, at

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2020-01-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

2019-10-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|