https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > Confirmed, started with r9-6404-g1ce59b6cad83d5ca6f1efee83f910d8b677a976a.
>
> Are you sure? It's only a daily bum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat pr93275.ii
template struct A { static constexpr int value = __v; };
template struct B;
template struct B { typedef _Tp type; };
template
using enable_if_t = typename B<_Cond, _Tp>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
