[Bug c++/94592] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-14 Thread pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 --- Comment #6 from Paco Arjonilla --- Thanks for supporting this feature. I think it is one of the core features that modern C++ should have.

[Bug c++/94592] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- {} as a template argument is currently only supported by GCC as an extension, but I raised this on the core C++ list and it seems that the the conclusion is that we want this to work, though there's no CWG

[Bug c++/94592] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-14 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/94592] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-14 Thread pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 Paco Arjonilla changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/94592] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-14 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94592] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from