https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> > The warning in the test case in comment #3 looks correct to me.
>
> Thank you! I'll try to re-reduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Similar example from xmms2 project, dynamic_cast<> version:
#include
// main loop interface
struct I {
virtual void run();
};
struct M : public I {
virtual void run();
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> The warning in the test case in comment #3 looks correct to me.
Thank you! I'll try to re-reduce and not introduce new NULLs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c++
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
