https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
I've been thinking about that too but not really coming up with anything given
the current design. One idea is to change warning() to return a unique "token"
and have inform() take it as an argument and do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0633768a1a2efe689e5505b3a95aa949d704b06
commit r11-2322-ge0633768a1a2efe689e5505b3a95aa949d704b06
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
