https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e91910d3576eeac714c93ec25ea3b15012007903
commit r11-6612-ge91910d3576eeac714c93ec25ea3b15012007903
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate, testing right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
So it's caused by PCH:
$ cat qt.ii
[empty]
$ cat q.ii
#pragma GCC pch_preprocess "cmake_pch.hxx.gch"
#pragma GCC push_options
#pragma GCC target ""
#pragma GCC pop_options
$ g++ -x c++-header qt.ii -o cmak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Right - that's the Qt bug I'm hoping to fix, but I don't get far because of the
ICE. :) The libstdc++ headers have been reorganized, so Qt's expectations that
numeric_limits is available without includin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #8)
> Also, you can just try the actual build, if you follow
> https://wiki.qt.io/Building_Qt_6_from_Git
I tried, but it fails quite fast with:
/home/marxin/bin/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Also, you can just try the actual build, if you follow
https://wiki.qt.io/Building_Qt_6_from_Git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Still can't reproduce it.
> Please send me also output of --verbose.
Yeah, I fed that output to g++, and then it compiles just fine. But when it's
in the actu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #6 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Created attachment 49946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49946&action=edit
Output of --verbose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Still can't reproduce it.
Please send me also output of --verbose.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Created attachment 49943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49943&action=edit
Output of gcc -E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
..or maybe I'm just too dumb to invoke g++ -E properly, and the rest of the
options confuse the compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
15 matches
Mail list logo