[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

2021-12-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Andrew

[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

2021-12-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

2021-12-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

2021-12-08 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

2021-08-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed in GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

2021-03-04 Thread xmh970252187 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 --- Comment #1 from jim x --- All the quotes refer to n4861.