[Bug c++/99909] The value of 'std::is_integral_v' is not usable in a constant expression

2021-09-28 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99909] The value of 'std::is_integral_v' is not usable in a constant expression

2021-09-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:daa762f01d8cf932484b7df122a5e872439bc92c commit r12-3950-gdaa762f01d8cf932484b7df122a5e872439bc92c Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/99909] The value of 'std::is_integral_v' is not usable in a constant expression

2021-09-27 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/99909] The value of 'std::is_integral_v' is not usable in a constant expression

2021-06-29 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909 --- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #1) > (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > > template class> > > constexpr auto f() {} > > That means auto is void, doesn’t it? Yes, the second auto just means void.

[Bug c++/99909] The value of 'std::is_integral_v' is not usable in a constant expression

2021-06-29 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909 Christopher Yeleighton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl

[Bug c++/99909] The value of 'std::is_integral_v' is not usable in a constant expression

2021-04-06 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Last