https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> > I see very similar for this legal C code:
>
> That seems like a different issue, please file it seperately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> I see very similar for this legal C code:
That seems like a different issue, please file it seperately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Likely triggered with r7-821-gc7986356a1ca8e8e.
>
> From Andrew's comment, it looks like the bug is before that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Likely triggered with r7-821-gc7986356a1ca8e8e.
>From Andrew's comment, it looks like the bug is before that transformation,
since it receives a bit_and_expr of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Keywords|
