https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5)
> __has_builtin() does not mean that the builtin is inlined. It only means
> that GCC recognizes the builtin. That is how __has_builtin() is documented.
> In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
Rohan McLure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
What are you actually trying to do here?
If you're trying to provide your own definitions for the atomic built-ins then
obviously you need to know platform-specific details, including whether that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
--- Comment #2 from Rohan McLure ---
The issue here is less that I don't have access to the symbol __atomic_store_8,
it's that the preprocessor directive __has_builtin appears to false positive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
