--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
22:59 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> Understood. Are you aware of any existing efforts to extend GCC in t
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 22:43
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> -- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
> Subject: error generated for storage class specified f
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
22:30 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> not supported by the present standard; it may be worthy of considera
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 21:41
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> --- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
> Subject: error generated for storage class specified
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
16:56 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - unless I misunderstand the question, the only way a pointer itself
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 15:20
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> - Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
>> Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic th
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
12:39 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for function parameter
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:-
> Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic that "static const"
> already does j
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 03:43
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
> No static is wrong here, period, what you need is an
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
03:10 ---
No static is wrong here, period, what you need is an attribute which tells the
back-end that these are
are pointers to ROM and such.
--
What|Removed |Added
