https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-03 20:08 ---
Isn't this a duplicate of PR37041? That PR is more complete than this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759
--- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 00:59 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
See this note for some details on the semantics of this warning,
with respect to keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00808.html
What's the status of this PR? Are there
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 20:28 ---
See this note for some details on the semantics of this warning,
with respect to keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00808.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759
--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-06 22:22 ---
Another C/C++ conflict (?) that could be possibly implemented in this warning
feature, enum declaration scoping:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00470.html
Not sure what the exact error message was.
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-06 22:26 ---
Not sure what the exact error message was.
Easy, the decls were not defined :). Basically the enums get the scope of the
struct they are defined in for C++ but in C, they get the global scope. A
warning for this
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-19 08:03 ---
Manuel - quick and dirty list got posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00412.html
I think #3 #4 are implemented, #1 #2 remain. There might be others of
course.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 16:08 ---
Gabriel, if you could do a quick and dirty list of what remains to be done,
perhaps some potential contributor would try to implement it as an entry point
to GCC development.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-18
01:55 ---
Isn't this fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-09-18 02:52 ---
Subject: Re: Implement warning for codes at the intersection of C and C++
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Isn't this fixed?
No. There are still other areas not covered.
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-09 15:05
---
working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gdr at
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-09
22:22 ---
Subject: Bug 21759
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 22:21:48
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-typeck.c c.opt
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
GCC host triplet|Plateform independent |
Keywords|
13 matches
Mail list logo
