--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 20:11 ---
Fixed so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-06 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 29172
Author: tromey
Date: Thu Dec 6 18:56:26 2007
New Revision: 130656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130656
Log:
gcc
PR c/29172:
* c-opts.c
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-06 18:58 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-12 20:24 ---
Testing a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 22:04 ---
Confirmed.
The problem is that the loop in c_common_parse_file calls
cpp_undef_all -- which undefines all symbols but does not
mark _cpp_file objects as not seen.
We probably need a new libcpp API for this.
--
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 23:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The compiler is failing to follow the documented behavior.
Because I (or anyone else) have not got around to actually testing the testcase
:).
--
--- Comment #4 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-12-06 04:07 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
The compiler is failing to follow the documented behavior.
Because I (or anyone else) have not got around to actually testing the
testcase
:).
I still don't see
--- Comment #2 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-10-19 05:28 ---
Why is this still UNCONFIRMED, and why is it marked enhancement?
The compiler is failing to follow the documented behavior.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29172
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 18:34 ---
I bet the C front-end forgot to tell the preprocessor to rest the pragma once
table.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
