[Bug c/30542] gcc 4.1.1 missing uninitialized variable warnings

2007-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-15 15:21 --- (In reply to comment #3) Is it really quite as 22456? That bug is about variable used for initializing itself, and really strange do-nothing code, while this one is straightforward use of unitialized variable:

[Bug c/30542] gcc 4.1.1 missing uninitialized variable warnings

2007-01-22 Thread david dot cuthbert at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from david dot cuthbert at gmail dot com 2007-01-22 14:31 --- Created an attachment (id=12931) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12931action=view) foo.i file Adding foo.i file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30542

[Bug c/30542] gcc 4.1.1 missing uninitialized variable warnings

2007-01-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 17:27 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22456 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/30542] gcc 4.1.1 missing uninitialized variable warnings

2007-01-22 Thread muntyan at tamu dot edu
--- Comment #3 from muntyan at tamu dot edu 2007-01-23 03:09 --- Is it really quite as 22456? That bug is about variable used for initializing itself, and really strange do-nothing code, while this one is straightforward use of unitialized variable: int main (void) { int i, foo;