--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 12:06 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18501 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-07 21:11 ---
This is clearly CCP. Probably a duplicate of 18501, better double check if
18501 is ever fixed.
The reason why uncommenting the block of code brings back the warning is that
CCP cannot assume that foo is just 50
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
