--- Comment #6 from michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2009-05-13
13:08 ---
As this seems to be a bug in glibc headers:
Would it be feasible to add an include-fix for this, to be able to use gcc-4.3
with older glibc?
--
michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at changed:
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 14:48 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
As this seems to be a bug in glibc headers:
Would it be feasible to add an include-fix for this, to be able to use gcc-4.3
with older glibc?
It should have already been. As libgfortran
--- Comment #8 from michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2009-05-13
15:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
Would it be feasible to add an include-fix for this
It should have already been. As libgfortran uses those headers.
Hmm, cannot find anything
--- Comment #5 from chris2553 at googlemail dot com 2008-09-09 17:50
---
Subject: Re: Assembler error message when building vlc-0.9.1
On Saturday 06 September 2008, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 21:39
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 21:39 ---
This code is invalid and is caused by changing C99/GNU99 extern inline to be
correct to what C99 says.
We have:
extern ssize_t pread (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __nbytes, __off64_t
__offset) __asm__ ( pread64)
--- Comment #1 from chris2553 at googlemail dot com 2008-09-05 14:54
---
Created an attachment (id=16233)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16233action=view)
Preprocessed file that triggers the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37384
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 19:43 ---
This regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37384
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 19:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853.
Ooops. Please ignore this comments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37384
