--- Comment #5 from dickinsm at gmail dot com 2009-08-29 07:05 ---
A quick note for anyone else who comes across this: this libm bug is fixed in
Snow Leopard (darwin 10).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37714
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 11:42 ---
Works on Linux where it replaces it with a call to sincos. Also works with
the Linux glibc if explicitly calling cexp like
static my_complex
c_rect(double phi)
{
my_complex z;
z.imag = __imag cexp (I * phi);
--- Comment #2 from dickinsm at gmail dot com 2008-10-02 14:34 ---
Thanks for the response!
It does appear to be true that cexp doesn't follow
Annex G of C99, on OS X 10.5.5. I agree that this
is undesirable, but I can't see why it should
be considered a bug.
Annex G of C99 is merely
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 15:37 ---
Well, Darwin GCC maintainers claim that darwin
/* All new versions of Darwin have C99 functions. */
#define TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS 1
so we just rely on that. If it is not true then this is either a darwin
bug or
--- Comment #4 from dickinsm at gmail dot com 2008-10-02 15:53 ---
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
I'll go and file a bug with Apple.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37714
