http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38037
--- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 18:54:43
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed May 25 18:54:40 2011
New Revision: 174221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174221
Log:
In libobjc/:
2011-05-25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38037
Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38037
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 20:32:46
UTC ---
Apologies. You are right; I committed a fix for libobjc/38307. ;-)
Thanks
--- Comment #1 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-11-06 20:58 ---
/* testcase
gcc -O2 -Wall -c foo.c */
char *get(void);
int use(const char *);
void foo(const char *bar)
{
char *foobar;
if(!bar)
foobar = get();
if(use(bar))
--- Comment #2 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-11-06 20:59 ---
/* testcase
* gcc -Wall -O2 -c foo.c
*/
char *get(void);
int use(const char *);
void foo(const char *bar)
{
char *foobar;
if(!bar)
foobar = get();
if(use(bar))
--- Comment #3 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-11-06 21:01 ---
Same happens if I use int instead of a pointer:
/* testcase */
/* gcc -O2 -Wall -c foo.c */
int get(void);
int use(int);
void foo(int bar)
{
int foobar;
if(!bar)
foobar = get();
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-06 21:11 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36550 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
