[Bug c/45610] misleading warning when operator paired with a constant - is it operator precedence?

2014-03-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45610 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c/45610] misleading warning when operator paired with a constant - is it operator precedence?

2010-09-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-09-09 12:20 --- Subject: Re: New: misleading warning when operator paired with a constant - is it operator precedence? You don't give a self-contained testcase whose behavior with different versions can be compared, but the

[Bug c/45610] misleading warning when operator paired with a constant - is it operator precedence?

2010-09-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 13:15 --- We need a testcase http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/minimize.html but I am pretty sure this is not warned anymore in GCC 4.6 (and probably GCC 4.4 and 4.5) -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What