[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

2011-08-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-14 09:58:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) if your math library implementation has a slower cosf than cos it's definitely broken ;) So it is at least for fedora (see

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

2011-08-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-12 15:10:51 UTC --- if your math library implementation has a slower cosf than cos it's definitely broken ;) So it is at least for fedora (see

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

2011-08-12 Thread fbafelipe at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #3 from Felipe fbafelipe at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 17:07:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) if your math library implementation has a slower cosf than cos it's definitely broken ;) So it is at least for fedora (see

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

2011-08-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-12 18:28:56 UTC --- Some bug reports for this performance issue date from 2008, so it seems we won't see that fixed any time soon. IIRC the excuses were: (1) nobody use

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

2011-08-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED