https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jan 21 03:38:32 2016
New Revision: 232662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/52291 - __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Documentation patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01581.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-17
08:53:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I mean that the pseudo-code is not consistent with valid C/C++ when the
> operands (`*ptr' and `value') are pointer types.
I would think it's implied th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
--- Comment #1 from Hubert Tong 2012-02-17 00:37:12
UTC ---
I mean that the pseudo-code is not consistent with valid C/C++ when the
operands (`*ptr' and `value') are pointer types.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-17
00:38:15 UTC ---
N.B. those built-ins are deprecated in favour of
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html
