https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |5.4
--- Comment #19 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org|
Target Milestone|5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Marek, is this fixed? Can we close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What's not fixed is this:
r.c:3:5: note: expected ‘int (*)(double *)’ but argument is of type ‘int
(*)(int *)’
int callf (int, int, int (*)(double *));
^
we should point to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jun 5 09:35:05 2014
New Revision: 211261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211261root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/56724
* c-typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #12 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I noticed this patch today and tried it out on my current
test case, which uses -Wc++-compat... unfortunately it
still fails.
Test code:
extern void xfer (int, int, unsigned char *);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yea, you're right, not everything has been fixed. I'll fix up this specific
case in a bit, thanks for reporting it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 27 20:14:22 2014
New Revision: 210980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210980root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/56724
* c-typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5)
I tried this today with a recent-ish gcc trunk build, and
there's been a regression.
Now:
barimba. gcc --syntax-only r.c
r.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5)
I tried this today with a recent-ish gcc trunk build, and
there's been a regression.
I think the problem is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried this today with a recent-ish gcc trunk build, and
there's been a regression.
Now:
barimba. gcc --syntax-only r.c
r.c: In function ‘docall’:
r.c:7:10: warning: passing argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6)
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5)
The new situation is much worse for me as it prevents automated
rewriting...
What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25 18:44:37
UTC ---
This affects g++ as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25
18:45:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
t.c: In function ‘docall’:
t.c:8:3: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘callf’ from incompatible pointer type
[enabled by default]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25 18:46:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Though it does say the 3rd argument though.
Sure, it is just nicer if the compiler counts commas instead of me doing it.
21 matches
Mail list logo
