https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #31 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #30)
builtin-arith-overflow-10/11 are target problem, I'm working on a fix.
builtin-arith-overflow-10/11 are fixed with the patch for pr64358.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #30 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #29)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
Assuming fixed.
builtin-arith-overflow-14/17 are fixed with the patch, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34179
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34179action=edit
gcc5-pr59708.patch
Untested fix for the ppc32 builtin-arith-overflow-14.c failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 3 20:35:08 2014
New Revision: 218331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218331root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/59708
* expmed.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 3 20:38:44 2014
New Revision: 218333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218333root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/59708
* expmed.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #29 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
Assuming fixed.
builtin-arith-overflow-14/17 are fixed with the patch, but
builtin-arith-overflow-1/10/11 still fail for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
builtin-arith-overflow-14.c still fails on ppc32 as of r218249.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #23 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #22)
So fixed?
Not on ppc64:
trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % cat out_check15 | grep overflow
FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-arith-overflow-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 22-Nov-14, at 2:31 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Is that with r217946 or later?
This is now fixed on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #20 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 22-Nov-14, at 2:31 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Is that with r217946 or later?
No. My latest build is r217898.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #18)
On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, I get:
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-14.c -O0 execution test
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
On alpha-linux-gnu, I got following g++ failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-17.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-17.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 12 12:28:06 2014
New Revision: 217415
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217415root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/59708
* builtin-attrs.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33912|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33891|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33855|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33855
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33855action=edit
gcc5-pr59708-wip1.patch
WIP untested patch, which implements so far the clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Martin von Gagern Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I rather not have builtins as you can write portable C code that detects
overflow just fine. GCC could have internal functions if needed which are used
when converting the pattern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #9 from Martin von Gagern Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
I rather not have builtins as you can write portable C code that detects
overflow just fine. GCC could have internal functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noloader at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
Not sure I like their naming though, I'd say they should be type generic
builtins handled in the FEs depending on the first argument's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #4 from Josh Triplett josh at joshtriplett dot org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
Not sure I like their naming though, I'd say they should be type generic
builtins handled in the FEs depending on the first argument's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
See what I said in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-10/msg00280.html about
the issues with something type-generic regarding detecting overflow on
types smaller
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #6 from Josh Triplett josh at joshtriplett dot org ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
See what I said in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-10/msg00280.html about
the issues with something type-generic regarding
31 matches
Mail list logo
