http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
--- Comment #6 from DaBler ---
When I call sizeof(...) on the int type (instead of a variable), it is the
same:
typedef int TypeInt __attribute((aligned(64)));
printf("%zu %zu\n", sizeof(TypeInt), alignof(TypeInt)); // Output: 4 64
Moreover, It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
When you call sizeof on a type T, by definition, it tells you how far 2
consecutive elements are in an array of T (obviously that needs to be a
multiple of the alignment). When you call it on a variable like thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
--- Comment #4 from DaBler ---
I see no reason why should not another variable be padded after struct as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
--- Comment #2 from DaBler ---
The output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.3/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
--- Comment #1 from DaBler ---
Created attachment 32227
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32227&action=edit
he preprocessed file that triggers the bug
Output:
64 64
64 64
4 64
4 64
4 64
Expected output:
4 64
4 64
4 64
4 64
4 6
