https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Hime Haieto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||himehaieto at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Ofee Oficsu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oficsu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||44209
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Federico Kircheis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||federico.kircheis at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
--- Comment #8 from pskocik at gmail dot com ---
I'd also very much welcome a way to silence this (like with
-Wno-undefined-inline on clang).
My reason for wanting it is I'd like to prototype a non-static inline function
in one header (a fast-to-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
pskocik at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pskocik at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> I don't think the C++ FE has this warning; it's about C99 inlines.
If not, it has a very similar warning:
/home/manuel/test.cc:1:13: warning: inline funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
--- Comment #4 from Eugene Zelenko ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
> Does Clang have an option for this? GCC could use the same name.
>
> (The same warning exists in the C++ FE, thus it should be controlled by the
> same op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
--- Comment #2 from Eugene Zelenko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Could you explain why you don't want to have this warning really. This
> warning is telling you that the inline function is not defined just like
> static func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Could you explain why you don't want to have this warning really. This warning
is telling you that the inline function is not defined just like static
functions.
13 matches
Mail list logo
