[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2016-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2016-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-09-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Another case is -Wdeclaration-after-statement: int fn (int m) { if (m > 0) return -1; int a; }

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67237 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67235 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 67230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread chengniansun at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #11 from Chengnian Sun chengniansun at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10) *** Bug 67230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Sorry, Marek. I did not realize that I had submitted so many

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

2015-08-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Moreover, since VLAs are not an extension in C99, the text of Wvla is wrong always for -std=c99. void square(int num) { int array[num]; } With -std=c99 -Wpedantic there is