https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
Arkadiusz Drabczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36488|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #8 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk ---
I attach a new patch with an extra whitespace after dot to keep up with an
existing convention.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #10 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk ---
Patch sent for review here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01303.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Patches welcome ;) I think refering to -Winline here might make most sense.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #4 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk ---
Created attachment 36488
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36488=edit
suggested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #5 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk ---
-Winline is mentioned in the next paragraph. The whole sentence I posted in the
first comment is:
"Some calls cannot be integrated for various reasons (in particular, calls that
precede the function's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #6 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk ---
Sorry, this code is wrong of course, value returned by factorial() must be used
to generate an actual code:
$ cat bug1.c
#include
#include
inline static int factorial(unsigned int i)
{
if(i <= 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
--- Comment #1 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk ---
BTW, the same incorrect wording is repeated in doc/extend.texi in GCC source
tarball.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
11 matches
Mail list logo
