[Bug c/78155] missing warning on invalid isalpha et al.

2020-05-04 Thread bruno at clisp dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155 Bruno Haible changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruno at clisp dot org --- Comment #6

[Bug c/78155] missing warning on invalid isalpha et al.

2019-08-05 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87403 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager

[Bug c/78155] missing warning on invalid isalpha et al.

2019-08-05 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- I don't really see what existing warning this might fall under, except perhaps -Wchar-subscripts because isalpha and friend use the argument as an index into an array of 257 characters, but that seems like a

[Bug c/78155] missing warning on invalid isalpha et al.

2019-08-04 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- Would you expect this warning to go under an existing flag, or a new one, Martin?

[Bug c/78155] missing warning on invalid isalpha et al.

2018-07-30 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > When I run the program, it prints 0 rather than crashing. (probably a difference between the Darwin Libc and glibc; it might be worth investigating what other

[Bug c/78155] missing warning on invalid isalpha et al.

2017-07-30 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|