https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79940
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 8 17:21:06 2017
New Revision: 245980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245980=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/79940
* gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): Replace index var in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79940
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79940
--- Comment #4 from Aidan Chalk ---
@Jakub ok - my bad, I had assumed the taskloop was a loop construct, but the
bug still exists with an omp single. Re: taskloop not being useful I made the
example to test syntax.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79940
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79940
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll fix this, that said the testcase certainly is not OpenMP compliant, you
have a data race in there, you need to do the taskloop just once, or make sure
that in each thread it will write to different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79940
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
