https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Can be also simulated with ObjC:
$ cat /tmp/objc.m
volatile int i;
int
foo (void)
{
@try {
switch (i)
{
case 1:
switch (i)
{
default:
return 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
So there's explanation what happens:
1) w/o -fsanitize=address:
decide_copy_try_finally returns true and so that we copy BB that contains
finally statement:
foo ()
{
int n;
int D.1806;
bar (&n);
i.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
--- Comment #1 from Simon Marchi ---
Forgot to mention, the initial problem I stumbled on was this function:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o-i386.c;h=b2f02415c3ae019224b25184539237d530c5bc7e;hb=HEAD#l
