https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
GCC lacks an equivalent for Clang's -Wdeprecated-non-prototype, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #11 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to David Brown from comment #9)
> Could -Wstrict-prototypes be added to -Wall, or even considered enabling by
> default? The next C standard will make "void foo()" mean the same as "void
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Brown from comment #9)
> Could -Wstrict-prototypes be added to -Wall, or even considered enabling by
> default? The next C standard will make "void foo()" mean the same as "void
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #9 from David Brown ---
Could -Wstrict-prototypes be added to -Wall, or even considered enabling by
default? The next C standard will make "void foo()" mean the same as "void
foo(void)", like in C++, which makes the scope for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> I posted a GCC 9 patch here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00675.html
>
> It adds -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wall. Unfortunately, it got
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
I posted a GCC 9 patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00675.html
It adds -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wall. Unfortunately, it got derailed by (IMO
unsubstantiated) concerns about the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> Incremental patch for the testsuite:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00962.html
>
> Unfortunately it sounds like it might be too late to enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at westcontrol dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Correction, the patch is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00935.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Incremental patch for the testsuite:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00962.html
Unfortunately it sounds like it might be too late to enable the option in GCC
8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 10 15:42:23 2018
New Revision: 256437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256437=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/82922
runtime, syscall: use full prototypes in C code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo
