https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3fe767c16e7c528e4fc71c8a68ac14b4573d880
commit r13-3887-gd3fe767c16e7c528e4fc71c8a68ac14b4573d880
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #15 from Baruch Burstein ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12)
>
> > I think the patch would need to wait for GCC 13 now though.
>
> Indeed.
Now that GCC 13 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #11)
> Clang does not appear to treat this pragma as a statement. Is this also the
> MSVC behavior?
Yes, I think so. I'll check that my patch is consistent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12)
> Jeff said at the end of the thread that he wouldn't mind
> if someone else approves it, so it's probably worth posting
> again.
OK, will do.
I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> I would say that is a terrible design...
Yes, I completely agree, but I don't see why GCC should be in the business of
diagnosing other people's junk :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Austin Morton from comment #5)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553182.html
>
> I sent a patch to do exactly that in 2020 and it was not accepted.
Thanks. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I would say that is a terrible design...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Exactly. Seems clang doesn't bother with it and allows anything, but it is
> unclear if that is the best thing to do.
MSVC ignores any tokens after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #5 from Austin Morton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> The docs raise some questions.
>
> They say that a #pragma region must be ended by a #pragma endregion. Should
> the compiler check that and issue a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Baruch Burstein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bmburstein at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
