https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Still going wrong in revision 270500. Here is a stack backtrace:
../../trunk/gcc/cse.c:2215:34: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 1 -
-9223
372036854775807 cannot be represented in type 'long int'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
No idea, and currently no resource to find out. Sorry.
There are plenty of ubsan bugs in gcc hanging around for
months, if not years. This is merely another one.
Wide int seems to be the favoured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Problem seems to occur sometime before revision 258870.
