https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
--- Comment #6 from Keith Thompson ---
Since Bug 91980 has been closed as a duplicate of this one, I'll
mention explicitly that another symptom of the bug is that this:
#include
complex x;
// _Complex y;
produces no diagnostic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
--- Comment #4 from Mark RISON ---
[Aside...
I can't see a way to raise a bug on the GCC Bugzilla itself, so:
The status of this bug is currently NEW. However the explanatory hyperlink,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
--- Comment #2 from Mark RISON ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Because 'complex' is from a system header probably ...
It still ought to give a diagnostic, no?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
