[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8156cfaa4c45f1249bbdda29d04b4fef84b7eafe commit r11-5180-g8156cfaa4c45f1249bbdda29d04b4fef84b7eafe Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- What I mean is that unless error_mark_node necessarily implies (and guarantees) the bound is a constant zero (as opposed to a similarly "broken" VLA bound), simply bailing is safer than skipping it. I have

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- As I said, [0] is not a VLA bound. And we don't record anything for constant bounds (even if they are in the middle). So perhaps: /* array_type_nelts assumes the middle-end TYPE_DOMAINs, while

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Actually, I missed that your patch just skips over the error node. That will leave the attribute spec out of sync with the argument (it contains a '$' for each VLA bound). Rather than continuing to the next

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > I was going to commit the following but I'll leave it to you. > > diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.c b/gcc/c/c-decl.c > index d348e39c27a..95cf9e4cb00 100644 > ---

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- I was going to commit the following but I'll leave it to you. diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.c b/gcc/c/c-decl.c index d348e39c27a..95cf9e4cb00 100644 --- a/gcc/c/c-decl.c +++ b/gcc/c/c-decl.c @@ -5775,6 +5775,10

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Target Milestone|---