https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
The main purpose of the "partly outside" warning is to detect reads/writes that
cross the trailing array boundary. Those typically come up when a "typeless"
buffer (either char array or one allocated by a fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
--- Comment #9 from Willy Tarreau ---
Hi Richard,
indeed, the &curr->list == &head is the test for end of list that prevents any
bad access from happening.
I know that usually the right way to do this is by using a list element, but
sometimes i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Note the example clearly violates C TBAA rules and the "optimization" of
eliding the data member(s) for 'head' are invalid. It's not only about
diagnostics but about wrong-code generation waiting to happen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Willy Tarreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Willy Tarreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
--- Comment #4 from Willy Tarreau ---
Hi Martin,
I'm sorry but I'm missing something, as this is how linked lists are
implemented everywhere nowadays. I'm not actually casting the pointer, it was
made for simplification. I'm only following the l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Summary|[11 regression]
