[Bug d/89418] D test cases fail on powerpc64le

2020-04-26 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89418 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw --- For now, I've the tests will return UNSUPPORTED, as they depend on full libphobos support that powerpc* targets simply don't have (because of incomplete or lacking any support in std.math and std.internal.gamma

[Bug d/89418] D test cases fail on powerpc64le

2020-04-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89418 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:873b5de87c3186d85bb497b0f9c13b8c5e425712 commit r10-7976-g873b5de87c3186d85bb497b0f9c13b8c5e425712 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon Ap

[Bug d/89418] D test cases fail on powerpc64le

2019-02-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89418 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Funny. real.mant_dig == 106 means 128bit IBM long double (or as some call it, double-double as the error message suggest). The error message is incorrect in both cases too: "Only 64-bit, 80-bit, and 128-b

[Bug d/89418] D test cases fail on powerpc64le

2019-02-20 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89418 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- real.mant_dig is 106 on powerpc64le

[Bug d/89418] D test cases fail on powerpc64le

2019-02-20 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89418 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g