--- Comment #7 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 19:18 ---
I'll have a look tomorrow
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 02:12
---
Showstopper.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 20:43 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux using the testcase from comment #4
identified the following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=100757
r100757 | nathan | 2005-06-08 11:49:23 + (Wed, 08 Jun 2005)
--- Comment #3 from wanderer at rsu dot ru 2005-11-13 18:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=10231)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10231action=view)
simplified testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24824
--- Comment #4 from wanderer at rsu dot ru 2005-11-13 18:20 ---
More simple testcase (without templates):
8X-
namespace N {
struct _V_base {
int _impl;
};
struct V : _V_base {
using _V_base::_impl;
};
} // namespace N
struct T {
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 19:09 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
