--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-12-29 12:26 ---
... to close as duplicate (since there's some discussion on the other bug)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33932 ***
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-12-29 12:25 ---
reopening...
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 02:33 ---
*** Bug 33932 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from zuogang at huawei dot com 2008-11-21 02:15 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> *** Bug 38186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I post the bug 38186;
I want to know why the asm-defined func is placed in .debug_macinfo section, is
it correct?
info from the o
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-21 01:27 ---
*** Bug 38186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2006-03-28 19:15 ---
OK, so it's tetex that's broken. Sorry for the invalid report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26908
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 18:45 ---
There is no garentee that bar will be in the text section.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2006-03-28 18:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=11141)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11141&action=view)
foo.s
Output of gcc -g3 -S foo.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26908
