--- Comment #15 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:57 ---
I don't think I can sort this one out. I think the easiest solution will be to
check when marking a function as reachable whether it has an abstract origin,
and if so set a flag in the abstract origin preventing its
--- Comment #13 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 17:29
---
(In reply to comment #12)
It is a cgraph change. There were several patches affecting
cgraph_remove_node
during this time period; it was probably one of those.
The problem appeared from r96653 to r96654;
--- Comment #14 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 20:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local
variable in a C++ constructor
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:29:38PM -, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
The problem appeared from r96653
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:34
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574
