--- Comment #7 from robert dot mance at intel dot com 2009-08-19 21:28
---
I've managed to download and install 4.4.5 of gfortran and can verify that what
you're doing here is just about identical to what ifort is doing.
I have a request to emit a DW_TAG_common_inclusion record in
--- Comment #5 from robert dot mance at intel dot com 2009-08-18 21:01
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Fixed.
Could you please tell me what version of gfortran this is fixed in? I'm
working the Intel Fortran compiler debug information at the moment regarding a
request to add
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 21:17 ---
GCC 4.4.0/4.4.1 have it, as well as GCC trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37738
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 22:23 ---
Is it fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37738
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 22:42 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 18:15 ---
Subject: Bug 37738
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 7 18:14:16 2008
New Revision: 140944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140944
Log:
PR debug/37738
* dwarf2out.c
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com 2008-10-05 15:33
---
Saw there also needless DW_OP_plus_uconst - it could be single DW_OP_addr for
all the common block variables (which would make the GDB support a bit easier).
program a2
INTEGER*4 a
INTEGER*4 b
common
