subject:"\[Bug debug\/42244\] \[4.5 Regression\] var\-tracking ICE for 300.twolf"

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-11 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 --- Subject: Bug 42244 Author: hjl Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009 New Revision: 155184 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184 Log: Backport testcases from trunk. 2009-12-11 H.J. Lu

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 17:16 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00222.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42244

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org

-- rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 22:37 --- Subject: Bug 42244 Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 7 22:37:21 2009 New Revision: 155062 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155062 Log: PR debug/42244 * ddg.c (add_inter_loop_mem_dep):

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 22:39 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-03 15:00 --- Created an attachment (id=19216) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19216action=view) gcc45-pr42444.patch Patch that fixes the ICE (and that testcase works even with -fcompare-debug). It shouldn't

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-03 15:03 --- Isn't adding any dependency based on DEBUG_INSNs going to cause problems with same code -g vs. -g0? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42244

[Bug debug/42244] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking ICE for 300.twolf

2009-12-03 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-03 15:34 --- @richi it would, if we didn't have code to deal with that in sched-deps. now, depl_on_debug_p() are accepted, ignored for purposes of scheduling decisions, and used only to reset debug stmts that were rendered