--- Comment #6 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 12:19 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44645 ***
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2010-08-04 13:29
---
Created an attachment (id=21395)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21395action=view)
Reproducer
How to Repeat:
Untar reproducer and run debugger to line 53.
check all parameters, they all of
--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 13:54 ---
related to PR 44645 ?
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 14:01 ---
there's no need to attach executables, people working on gcc bugs have access
to a compiler!
I think this is the same issue as I reported in PR 44645 as it only happens
with 4.5 not 4.1, 4.4 or 4.6
--
--- Comment #4 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2010-08-04 14:23
---
Yes, this looks similar. The same error is seen in dwarf
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45181
--- Comment #5 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 14:29 ---
reduced
struct S { int f(S*); };
int S::f(S* p)
{
return 0;
}
int main()
{
S s;
return s.f(s);
}
within S::f p has type void*
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45181
