http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-03-28 09:12:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23788
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23788
GDB patch attempt with ptype regressions.
(In reply to comment #4)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28
09:22:57 UTC ---
.debug_types only appears with -gdwarf-4, I don't think any gcc defaulted to
that yet, so if you are talking about DW_AT_accessibility default, IMHO just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
--- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23
09:31:08 UTC ---
I am not sure to understand why the DW_TAG_type_unit DIE should have a
DW_AT_producer attribute. From the DWARF-4 specification, I can't see
DW_AT_producer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23
11:28:28 UTC ---
This is a very lightly tested patch to add the DW_AT_producer
attribute to the DW_TAG_type_unit DIE.
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
--- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-03-23 13:07:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I think it is a bad idea to add DW_AT_producer to .debug_type units. Making
each .debug_types addition 4 bytes longer is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
