[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2017-03-24 Thread woodard at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #13 from Ben Woodard --- This adds some additional complexity to a feature request in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19949. It would be helpful it were resolved.

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2016-04-26 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard --- Having to parse line information to skip the prologue us somewhat inconvenient. Especially since GCC doesn't actually emit DW_LNS_set_prologue_end, you have to use some heuristic to determine whether you

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2013-12-25 Thread fche at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #11 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com --- This problem continues to hit in gcc 4.8.2.

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-12-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |---

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-08-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-13 08:55:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) It would not be helpful, systemtap would then see no data (just not wrong data). Also at that time location list will need

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-08-12 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 2012-08-12 18:37:26 UTC --- It would not be helpful, systemtap would then see no data (just not wrong data). Also at that time location list will need to be used and currently

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-08-12 Thread fche at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #5 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com 2012-08-12 20:21:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) It would not be helpful, systemtap would then see no data [...] Not quite; systemtap can search the PC ranges/line tables for a

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-08-12 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 --- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-12 20:30:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) It would not be helpful, systemtap would then see no data [...] Not quite; systemtap can search the PC

[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-08-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug