http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
20:05:29 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:05:24 2012
New Revision: 192000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192000
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
20:17:53 UTC ---
The work around is installed in the trunk, and will soon be in the branch as
well, but this should ideally be left open until we figure out a better
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-03
04:02:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 3 04:02:38 2012
New Revision: 192021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192021
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-oe-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20
14:03:39 UTC ---
Alex, the patch is ok for trunk and 4.7 branch. That said, with similar code
just appearing not in call site parameter, but in a .debug_loc section we'd ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-07
18:47:16 UTC ---
For those running into the problem, analternative to patching GCC isto reduce
the maximum expression depth for var-traking with --param
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-07
02:26:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27954
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27954
Patch that fixes (or works around?) the problem
We have a relatively
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #3 from Evgeniy Dushistov dushistov at mail dot ru 2012-07-14
22:18:12 UTC ---
I searched commit which cause error.
Here is result of running test from this bugreport, with such command:
arm-none-eabi-g++ -O2 -g -c /tmp/test.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.2.4
14 matches
Mail list logo
