[Bug debug/83199] [8 Regression] FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp & gdb.base/skip.exp

2017-11-29 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199 --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil --- The Comment 5 binaries SEGV and do not start on Fedora 26 armv7l. But I do not see some wrong DWARF there. (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #3) > Addresses are missing when the function is inlined.

[Bug debug/83199] [8 Regression] FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp & gdb.base/skip.exp

2017-11-29 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Created attachment 42742 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42742=edit Executable async and skip produced by GCC trunk

[Bug debug/83199] [8 Regression] FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp & gdb.base/skip.exp

2017-11-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83199] [8 Regression] FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp & gdb.base/skip.exp

2017-11-29 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---

[Bug debug/83199] [8 Regression] FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp & gdb.base/skip.exp

2017-11-29 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Are we sure this is not gdbs fault? GDB version was fixed when I did my bisect. That said, I don't know what sort of change happened in DWARF so it may

[Bug debug/83199] [8 Regression] FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp & gdb.base/skip.exp

2017-11-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|FAIL: