[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-02-28 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Santos --- You are AWESOME!! :)

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-02-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 08:59:15 2018 New Revision: 258057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258057=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/83917 * configure.ac (AS_HIDDEN_DIRECTIVE):

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-02-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-02-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 26 19:46:34 2018 New Revision: 258010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258010=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/83917 * config/i386/i386-asm.h (PACKAGE_VERSION,

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-02-25 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01294.html My apologies on dropping the ball here and thanks for picking it up! :)

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-02-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-01-20 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Testcase would be nice. *sigh* Yes, I've seen that there are tests that run gdb through expect, I haven't learned how to use that yet. (In reply to Jakub

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-01-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

2018-01-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug Target Milestone|---