https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 30 11:15:39 2019
New Revision: 275072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275072=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-11-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 8 10:04:51 2019
New Revision: 267693
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267693=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-11-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 30 20:55:41 2018
New Revision: 266689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266689=gcc=rev
Log:
PR debug/85550
* g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr85550.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Huh, I never expected types to have "locations" ;) I don't think we can use
DW_OP_GNU_variable_value because the refered to DIE would be in another
section.
We could simply avoid splitting out those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
