https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5039b7259e64a92f5c077fe4d023556d6b12550
commit r9-8479-gb5039b7259e64a92f5c077fe4d023556d6b12550
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0be9efad938726721fd8c8c35609b1e1d7d30035
commit r10-7560-g0be9efad938726721fd8c8c35609b1e1d7d30035
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
--- Comment #5 from Hannes Domani ---
I also should mention that this is a precursor to fix gdb_bug 24154:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24154
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
--- Comment #3 from Domani Hannes ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Looking through DW_TAG_const_type seems insufficient to me, can't there be
> other qualifications (at least DW_TAG_volatile_type, perhaps in various
> orders)?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
--- Comment #2 from Domani Hannes ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Looking through DW_TAG_const_type seems insufficient to me, can't there be
> other qualifications (at least DW_TAG_volatile_type, perhaps in various
> orders)?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
